What's the issue?
Your page has an image available but uses the summary card type on X/Twitter. The summary card shows a small square thumbnail (144x144px) next to the text, while summary_large_image displays a large image above the text — which gets significantly more engagement.
Visual comparison
summary card
- Small square image on the left
- Title and description on the right
- Compact, text-focused layout
summary_large_image card
- Large image spanning the full width
- Title and description below
- Visual-first layout that dominates the feed
Why switch to summary_large_image?
- 40% more clicks on average compared to summary cards
- More visual real estate in the timeline — your link stands out
- Better for content with images — If you have an OG image, show it off
- Higher engagement — Users are naturally drawn to large images
How to fix it
<!-- Before -->
<meta name="twitter:card" content="summary" />
<!-- After -->
<meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image" />When to keep "summary"
There are valid reasons to use the smaller card:
- No meaningful image — Your image is a logo or generic graphic
- Text-focused content — The description is more important than the visual
- Profile pages — A small avatar-style thumbnail is more appropriate
Image requirements for summary_large_image
- Recommended: 1200 x 600px (2:1 ratio)
- Minimum: 300 x 157px
- Maximum file size: 5MB
- Formats: JPG, PNG, WebP, GIF