Info Twitter

Twitter Card Is "summary" — Consider Using "summary_large_image"

Using "summary_large_image" displays a larger image on X/Twitter for more engagement.

What's the issue?

Your page has an image available but uses the summary card type on X/Twitter. The summary card shows a small square thumbnail (144x144px) next to the text, while summary_large_image displays a large image above the text — which gets significantly more engagement.

Visual comparison

summary card

  • Small square image on the left
  • Title and description on the right
  • Compact, text-focused layout

summary_large_image card

  • Large image spanning the full width
  • Title and description below
  • Visual-first layout that dominates the feed

Why switch to summary_large_image?

  • 40% more clicks on average compared to summary cards
  • More visual real estate in the timeline — your link stands out
  • Better for content with images — If you have an OG image, show it off
  • Higher engagement — Users are naturally drawn to large images

How to fix it

<!-- Before -->
<meta name="twitter:card" content="summary" />

<!-- After -->
<meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image" />

When to keep "summary"

There are valid reasons to use the smaller card:

  • No meaningful image — Your image is a logo or generic graphic
  • Text-focused content — The description is more important than the visual
  • Profile pages — A small avatar-style thumbnail is more appropriate

Image requirements for summary_large_image

  • Recommended: 1200 x 600px (2:1 ratio)
  • Minimum: 300 x 157px
  • Maximum file size: 5MB
  • Formats: JPG, PNG, WebP, GIF

Related articles